Recently, the phenomenon of including employees by top level authorities in company's decision making process has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of including all the employees in making decisions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that inclusion of every employee to decide the company's future can be a plus, and i will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a company's perspective, the decisive role of employees in company's future can provide some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the length of company's age, as well as profits, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when i was working for a company which included their employees in deciding their next goal, it gave us a sense of purpose and I felt important. Thus, beneficial ramifications of including the employees in the decision making process can be seen.
Within the realm of company, inclusion of all employees in making decisions might increase the chances of causing delays in important deals. Moreover, fundamental aspects of allowing employees to direct the fate of the company could relate to this reality that people don't always think rationally and they have proclivity towards their own interests, which might affect the company's profit negatively. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of including all employees in making decisions is correlated negatively with company's cost to profit ratio. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of involving everyone in this process.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, i profoundly believe that the benefits of including employees in making decisions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of involving people in important matters prove the significance of integration, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems What are the underlying causes Who is responsible to combat this What measures 93
- Many people think that regions affect successful person. What is your opinion about native region and accomplished person's influence on the region he belongs to? 77
- Do you think English will remain as the dominant international language through globalization? 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... the companys future can be a plus, and i will analyze that throughout this essay...
^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...p. According to my own experience, when i was working for a company which include...
^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ould relate to this reality that people dont always think rationally and they have p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 323.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47678018576 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02578325071 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575851393189 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.96805917 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.416666667 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0454401920479 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216622011217 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251951034087 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314222372407 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00253976965364 0.0609392437508 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.