How to Successfully Handle Job and Studies at the same time?
Recently, phenomenon of concurrent job and study management has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "how to successfully handle job and studies at the same time?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is impossible, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the general perspective standpoint, studies are bound up inextricably with educational system, which indicates they lead to both time and energy consumption. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between academic performance and university degree as well as an exponential increase in job opportunity. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of job success is correlated positively with not only practical experience but also theoretical courses.
Within the realm of social belief, without the slightest doubt, career life attribute to academic study, in that it would come down to full-employment, long working hour, and hard working. A salient example of such attribution is remote working, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take time saving for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint wrong time management problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to part-time work, professional job, and even mind ability. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of study planning.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well, that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that time scheduling for study must be taken account to handle job and studies at the same time. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree Or Medical technology helps to live long life Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind 77
- What are the effects of doing sport on the human s overall health and lifetime 77
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 80
- What are the effects of doing sport on the human s overall health and lifetime 77
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pects of that throughout this essay. From the general perspective standpoint,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rience but also theoretical courses. Within the realm of social belief, witho...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pivotal role of study planning. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes 'alls well, that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60942760943 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13662342525 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680134680135 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1553965987 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38532126869 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102318433102 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140915558166 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22809998958 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121657698398 0.0609392437508 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.