Human values are losing because of wealth-producing careers such as medicine? Do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the loss of human values due to money making professions. Some people think that increase in the wealth producing careers has not reduced basic human values, while others maintain that professionalists are now more inclined towards money rather than catering for basic human rights. This essay will discuss that how wealth-producing professions have diminished basic human values.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the loss of basic ethics and human values due to money making professions. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the lust for money. Over time, humans have become more inclined towards money. Therefore, professionalists in the pursuit of making money, outrun all human values. For instance, doctors are now using their sacred profession as money making machine and have crushed all basic values of humanity. As a result, it is quite evident that the greed for money has led to a society with loss of basic human values.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is the increase in corruption. People employed in police and judiciary tend to abide by bribery to make money and in doing so they not only undermine human rights and values but also disturb the law and order of the society. As an example, people living in Pakistan are deprived of their basic human rights due to the corrupt police system. As a matter of fact, negligence in human values to earn more money has become a common practice.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that the innate nature of humans for lust and greed for money in wealth-producing professions has led to the loss of basic ethics and human values.
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks betweem 1978 and 2009 61
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should f
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour Write a letter to your neighbour In your letter introduce yourself describe your plans for the party invite your neighbour to co 78
- Some people always follow their dreams even if the dreams are ambitious Some think people should focus on achieving realistic goals 45
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09059233449 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72266154999 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505226480836 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9297705797 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16885848495 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690831424348 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446960161231 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125325254627 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402848470863 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.