The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree.
Recently, the importance of travel for education has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is the travel importance for education?". Whereas it is a widely held view that Briliant scholars locked themselves at home, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, travel is bound up inextricably with personal experiences, which indicates it leads to both practical skills and general information. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between vast knowledge and familiar wih different cultures as well as an exponential increase in ancient costumes. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of several different places is correlated positively with not only international visitors but also private education.
Within the realm of ecosociety, without the slightest doubt, the travel life attribute to more job experience, in that it would come down to brilliant students, academic search, and criative imagination. A salient example of such attribution is staying at home, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take critical thinking for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint international travelling problems. Likewise, hardlyhad they confined their attention to long journey, foreign culture, and even local economy. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the country's progress.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that travelling is more professional for education. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | foadihasan | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | adnanshah86 | 55 | view |
| 2018-05-10 | mayda | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | imala1 | 87 | view |
- The envornment we are live in is in danger due to various problems. So what do you think should be responsible for solving it.Is the government,organizations or individuals. 85
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 80
- Global transportation has escalated the cost of the country Describe the advantages and disadvantages 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...s the contention that the likelihood of several different places is correlated positively with no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes, 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81533101045 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21655066891 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679442508711 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.935680519 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.384615385 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239279787219 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632180616816 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068385737224 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137385807809 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925393969705 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.