kind of friend
The importance of kind of friend id better which was always debatable has now become more the controversial with many people that claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that best friend is very important to our life. Consequently, best friend is very compulsory in my life because helpful is bad situation. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that only one friend made in life. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some merits but one of the crucial effects that kind of friend is better one is very similar to you or one who is very different. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of kind of friend do you prefer are indeed too a great to ignore.
- government encourage a certain percentage 77
- foreign language should be compulsory in the schools. 77
- large shopping malls are replacing the small shops. 80
- The time people devote in the job leaves very little time for personal life how wide spread is the problem What problem will the shortage of time cause 55
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. give your opinion? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88479262673 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66246208768 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5551573552 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262397061269 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918319664369 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926799975193 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172918439204 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457213594275 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.