Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience is it a positive
development?
Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping malls has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " Is replacing local shops with big shopping malls a positive development?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that local shops are highly beneficial for cities and towns. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economical standpoint, local shops are bound up inextricably with small stores, which indicates they lead to both domestic economics and economic improvement. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between revenues and expenditures as well as an exponential increase in selling different commodities. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of city shops is correlated positively with not only investment progress but also financial problems.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, large shopping malls attribute to decreased job opportunities, in that it would come down to the unemployment, careers, and immigration. A salient example of such attribution is increased consumption, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take huge malls for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint people's unsatisfaction problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to social inequalities, shopping centers, and even the competitive market. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of local stores.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that local shops are vital for cities and towns. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-28 | brandnewiman | 85 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience is it a positive development? 85
- With the digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Uneversities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your ow 88
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. 11
- Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge number of exams in schools, children should learn more. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas. 77
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you think this is realistic in our life today? To what extent do you agree with this statement? S 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70344827586 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23178330115 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0038263999 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341964240614 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092378634732 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107571900986 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198634453321 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129730522854 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.