Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.)
Replacing the giant malls instead of small shops and all its effects on nations has become a controversial issue among the public all around the world. Although this issue is regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that this replacing is beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why utilizing the large shopping mals instead of local shops is advantageous. First and foremost, these large and complex malls are ideal for the modern society. Namely, due to the offering the various kinds of shops in one place, settlers have easy access to them and can purchase easily. Furthermore, because of this issue that all shops are close together, the competitive market will be formed by them and customers can buy their neccessities with suitable prices.
Moreover, time saving will be formed by this concentration and it is quite significant for people who live in big cities and have a sadentary lifestyle.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the deleting the small shops has some demerits as well. Not only it is impossible to build these malls in every areas but also after building we have need to a desirable management. For instance, if the area does not allocate appropriate parkings, citizens will have a plethora of difficulties in order to use them.
In conclusion, while the large malls have some disadvantages, I strongly believe that their benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2018-02-17 | vahid07 | 88 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- The violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- Do you think that place where a person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain for example. Does region affect successful people? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84545578991 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62109375 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3064550395 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209687125742 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707288823709 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035270244579 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983520766309 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045823360432 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.