Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that the phenomenon of large shopping malls replacing small shops is playing more and more important role in our life. Some people believe that this change can have beneficial effects in people live, while others oppose that it may influence harmfully for the public. As far as I am concerned, large shopping malls take the place of small shops will be more advantageous in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of the small shops are primarily focusing on the preservation of traditional handicrafts. They argue that the small traditional handicraft shops cannot afford the lease agreement in a large shopping mall, which will limit their growth and cause them to close down. Therefore, many traditional skills will be lost, and our future generations will be only through pictures or the internet to learn about the traditional things.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that the large shopping malls have more benefits. First of all, the large shopping malls can accommodate more different goods. A lot of goods can be displayed in one building so that customer can have a one-stop shopping experience. Moreover, people have more choices for the same products with different brands in large shopping malls. People can compare prices and features and purchase the most satisfying products.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that the unavoidable result of the large shopping malls taking a place of small shops is in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | ardalan1984 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | D_M | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | 6tttcj | 80 | view |
- The information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree 81
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 55
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or 77
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Do you think this statement is realistic in today’s life? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21235521236 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76108482157 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6349980128 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260798166006 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105430193466 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069991567743 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171257033755 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656023752388 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.