Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.
There is no doubt that learning a new language at an early age is advantageous for children. However, some people say that it have some negative consequences on them. This essay will discuss my views on this notion.
A child’s brain grabs things quicker during development. Scientists have proven that a child learns 95 percent more rapidly at his younger age. So he will not get confused in learning 2 or more language if taught earlier. This also acts as brain riddles which helps to keep the mind sharp and active.
Learning more than 2 languages increases the chances of getting good job, thus one have more work opportunities and do not suffer due to lack of employment. Due to this, one becomes able to tackle with any unexpected circumstances.
This has also some negative effects. Sometime a child gets confused in learning 2 languages at the similar time. It also increases burden on him. Due to this, he can suffer some health issues.
To conclude, I believe that the benefits of learning a language outweigh the demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-21 | foxygirl | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | prabhdyal | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | Priyu | 55 | view |
| 2017-12-03 | Amir NIkzad | 77 | view |
| 2017-12-03 | Amir NIkzad | 77 | view |
- Some people believe that governments should pay for healthcare and education, but others disagree with this opinion. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 55
- •What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 72
- Recently the freedom to work and live anywhere has become the main trend due to the development of communication technology and transportation. 55
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 1207.87684729 72% => OK
No of words: 178.0 242.827586207 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89887640449 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.92707691288 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72679753926 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657303370787 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 379.143842365 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.5024630542 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4978380391 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.2857142857 104.977214359 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7142857143 20.9669160288 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254851225822 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835466155926 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931460804167 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135446584795 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660151236192 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 12.6369458128 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 53.1260098522 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.9458128079 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.25 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 55.0591133005 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.3980295567 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.