Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Do u agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.
The involvement with a different language background is favourable for children. While some people believe this argument is erroneous, others believe learning a second language is crucial for kids.
This essay will discuss why the contact of children with a different language in their first years is beneficial.
Firstly, the contact with a second language in the first years of life is essential for youngsters. The increase in cultural awareness clearly defines one of the most dominant argument. For example, children who have been taught a second language also shown to be more empath with other cultures. As a result of this, learning a second language is extremely important for children.
Secondly, the advantages of learning a second language are significant for kids. As a consequence of contact with another language at an early age, kids have shown enhancements to their analytical skills. For instance, Asians children who migrate to English - speaking countries, and are capable of solving puzzles in seconds.
This essay discussed why learning a second language at an early age is extremely important because of the development of cultural awareness and analytical skills. In view of the arguments outlined above, this practice has positive outweigh on children’s future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | maniram vicky | 62 | view |
| 2019-05-25 | andrefreitas | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 77 | view |
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 55
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 61
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 22
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 65
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47263681592 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93106098841 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 139.433497537 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6360086784 50.4703680194 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284197259668 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119011390373 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545357830819 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171137558941 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564793038794 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.