Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive
for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree?
There are enormous advantages of learning a new language. The childhood is the time of learning, getting mature and molding one's career accordingly. The moot question is either learning a new language brings positive or negative effects. I will advocate the first part and will offer reasons to support my viewpoints.
Firstly, being a bilingual requires the brain to work harder as to distinguish between two different type of sounds. According to the US child institution, it was found that the children who were bilingual reacted to the stimuli much faster as compared to those who knew the only single language. It also aids in other skills such as reading and listening. It helps in the strong brain development and quick decision making.
Secondly, the scope of the person's memory widens as he has to retain in his memory the different sounds of the languages. Further, it helps in bridging the cultural gap, knowing the second language means the interaction with a diversified environment. For example, the Japanese language is based on the light and dark blue color, learning this language helps to perceive the world in various ways. It strengthens the cognitive process to a larger extent.
In the nutshell, learning a new language at an earlier age is absolutely advantageous as it fastens the cognitive process, improves the brain functionality and raises the awareness of being intellectual.
- Producers or the consumers should be held responsible to avoid the over-packaged products. 77
- The only thing that interfere with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What doeshe mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 50
- In education system, assessment through formal written examination still valid? 96
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said theopposite as well. 11
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positivefor their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree? 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...of learning, getting mature and molding ones career accordingly. The moot question i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... making. Secondly, the scope of the persons memory widens as he has to retain in hi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19213973799 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87328944307 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628820960699 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6101307131 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4615384615 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19402690057 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561560981258 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662497190018 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10933171871 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507824265697 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.