In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?

Recently, the phenomenon of sending children to different kinds of paid work, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that these works cannot be highly beneficial and are completely wrong, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that this experience is important for learning and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support engaging children in different kinds of paid work. At first, one disadvantage of children working is losing their education time. However, practical works are important for learning. For example, by working in technical workshops the kids can study various techniques such as mechanics like schools.
In addition, losing education system is negative for literacy aspects such as writing skills and reading. But, by working early age children could be very successful. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of rich people such as Bill Gates started working in early age that learned him transaction and business.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of utilizing children in paid works far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for their life experience, but also for taking responsibility.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of sending chil...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...niques such as mechanics like schools. In addition, losing education system is ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... learned him transaction and business. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49557522124 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99725773327 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0984185433 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395426941472 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134772691783 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550774559554 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224999633393 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585296994986 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.