in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the issue of old population growth has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Does this increasing trend have positive or negative impacts on our society?". Whereas it is a widely held view that increasing proportion of older people can have both positive and negative effects on the society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, aging population problem is bound up inextricably with decreasing population growth, which indicates that they lead to both decreasing birth rate and lack of workforce. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the working age and retirement age as well as an exponential increase in the generation gap. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented so far supports the contention that likelihood of age discrimination is correlated positively with not only emotional and physical abilities but also pensioners and longevity.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, population aging attribute to more financial pressures on government, in that it would come down to pension commitments, health insurance costs, and extra nursing costs. A salient example of such attribution is a holistic pension scheme, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take working population for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint labor market problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of elderly care charges.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that increasing number of older people in the society can have some serious negative impacts on the future of our society. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 336.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59226190476 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10584121386 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 139.433497537 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651785714286 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0448184129 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.538461538 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181862034409 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521627930624 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812646498859 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112346458682 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115544282184 0.0609392437508 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 55.0591133005 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.