Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to develop quality in people's lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art.
The improvement of the quality of life is the goal of many countries which significantly invest amounts of money on art. However, other factors are more relevant when enhancements like these are to be achieved. This essay will discuss why governments should invest in technology and better health systems instead of arts.
Nowadays, technologic advancements are capable of helping people’s lives and improve the quality of life throughout many aspects. Machines are becoming increasingly intelligent at an extremely rapid pace. Every day, For example, computer systems are able to perform difficult tasks which humans would spend valuable time to conclude. As a result of this, people can be actively involved in pleasureble tasks which dramatically increase the quality of life.
Secondly, a stable health system is an important aspect of the improvement of the quality of life among countries. Cities which have good health system are able to provide excellent health coverage for the inhabitants contributing significantly for their well being. For example, Tokyo which has the most efficient health system in the world and also presents high levels of quality of life. Obviously, these countries will grow rapidly their indicators of quality of life.
To sum up, the practice of investing in art is adopted by countries worldwide to improve quality of life. In my opinion, governments should inject money into technologic enhancements and a reliable health system to grow rapidly quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-15 | andrefreitas | 77 | view |
- The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. 61
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 72
- “Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice then eating meat”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 55
- What is the best invention of last 100 years the computer antibiotics the airplane and explain why 37
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42127659574 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89988682441 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570212765957 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7451620138 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216044114648 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791443513987 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647047026472 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14615626778 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640506769668 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.