Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies?
Recently, the phenomenon of "marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short-term strategies" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that marketing in companies might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the reputation of companies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the brand standpoint, the role of reputation in marketing can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the brand image and being a well-known firm are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of reputation in sales of companies. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both marketing management and marketing strategies distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, short-term strategies of marketing in companies might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the quality of products. Moreover, fundamental aspects of marketing plans can relate to the reality that the demerits of short-term strategies can pertain to the lack of budgets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the lack of research and development section were correlated positively with long-term plans, the local authorities would ultimately address the benefits of long-term schemes. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of earning more income.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of marketing in companies based on reputation far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | ptepractice | 77 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Being a journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world To what extent you agree with it 88
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 88
- The charts below show the results of a survey if adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 72
- National happiness index has better performance than economic increase in a nation s development Do you agree and how to measure national happiness 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77083333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33483039299 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2551199486 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.090909091 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502078783503 0.242375264174 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166788482973 0.0925447433944 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130764261263 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268746260955 0.151781067708 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11486373084 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Actually, the question is…
Actually, the question is quite difficult. There are a lot of various aspects that you need to keep in mind
Very cool essay, thank you!…
Very cool essay, thank you! It might help me, but it's a little lacking in information. Where can I find more information about google ads, can anyone tell me?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77083333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33483039299 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2551199486 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.090909091 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502078783503 0.242375264174 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166788482973 0.0925447433944 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130764261263 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268746260955 0.151781067708 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11486373084 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.