Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Now deaths are highly concentrated at older ages and this could only be possible with advances in medical care. This increase in average life expectancy can be regarded as one of the society’s greatest achievements but some people don’t see it as a positive development.
Some reports suggest that average age of death has been increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.3 in 2016. Though the trend is encouraging as now our near and dear ones live longer. The data shows that humans are making right health related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. This can be cited as a great achievement for individuals and society but it also means many countries facing an aging population.
With the improvement in life expectancy, there has been 10 fold increase in oldest people that now constitute the fastest growing part of the total population. There are more people of older age throughout the World. This also means the extra financial burden on families having more older people. As human age grows we get more vulnerable to diseases and sickness. The regular health checkups and constant observation of health care experts are usually expensive and it can burn a hole in patient’s family. It’s good that one can stay for long years with his or her family and enjoy happy moments but financial burden can cause conflict within the family.
Furthermore, longer longevity (Life) also means less young working force for a country. For a country, lack of young working force could mean less prosperity and growth. We are living on a planet with lesser resources and most of the resources humans are consuming are non-renewable. What will we do with longevity with no resources? Longer longevity puts an extra burden on individuals and society.
For the reasons discussed above I can conclude that an increase in average life expectancy rate can put the burden on environment and society but it can be dealt jointly by individuals and society. After all longer longevity is a symbol of growing civilization and the better life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-11 | imala1 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 65 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 72 | view |
- Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international language? 95
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 72
- Some people think that books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Whether studying films at schools is as important as studying literature? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the oldest'.
Suggestion: in the oldest
...ctancy, there has been 10 fold increase in oldest people that now constitute the fastest ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...tra financial burden on families having more older people. As human age grows we get more ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 349.0 242.827586207 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02005730659 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7685163095 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3636806763 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2105263158 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15789473684 7.25397266985 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138815166504 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416239094569 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304423826753 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789257880465 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166163597204 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.