Medical technology is responsible for human's life expectancy.to what extent do you agree and disagree?
The importance of the medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the medical technology is responsible for the human is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies fact that technology increase day by day and help the human life. Therefore, it is a vital time to appreciate both the significance of the medical technology is responsible for the human for the overall amelioration of society.
However, it has some people choose think differently and hold on opposing viewpoint, which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the medical technology is responsible for human life? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that medical technology effect on human body x-ray machine, chemical. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the medical technology is responsible for human cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy. While it is evident it has various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Nobal hundal | 72 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Rohit mahajan | 61 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
- Should big companies use offers and discount as their marketing strategy? How does it affect their reputation? 11
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue? 77
- Today the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. What you believe are the reasons for this what can be done to prevent this from happening. 77
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and these is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily product but other country have to be transported for a long distance. to what extent do the advantages outweigh this advantage? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and agains...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it. T...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to think'
Suggestion: to think
...y. However, it has some people choose think differently and hold on opposing viewpo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58365758755 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29968889857 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533073929961 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.539502813 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36199034841 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136853374971 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11576140186 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239354311726 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646859947264 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.