“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in advancement in technology and development in internet has provided more information online rather than going to libraries. There is a wide spread worry this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious consideration.
There are a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that unlike online information, libraries are having more authentic and reliable books. Not only can these books based on thorough research and authentic bibliography, but can also provide evidence of the authenticity of the facts written in them. For instance, reference from the library books are the only acceptable source in research. Needless to say, all these benefits stand library books in good stead as far as uselessness is concerned.
Another other pivotal aspect is that thanks to library, everyone can easily access to library to enhance their knowledge whether you are wealthy or not. Besides, it gives an opportunity to engage the reader. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of reading library books instead of collecting online information.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that benefits of library books are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | English time | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...its serious consideration. There are a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, then, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9096329062 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7976505066 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182831208562 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553850477899 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491376930667 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947622249691 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196684821806 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.