should government improve public networks or roads ?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge is seeing many government investing public transport instead of building more roads for private vehicle. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are a myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that thanks to improved public network, people can move from one place to another with much ease. Not only does public network help to save a lot of money, but it also plays a very handy role to prevent the environment from greenhouse gases that are caused by a number of private cars. Needless to say, all these benefits stand people in good stead as far as convenience and economic is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect is that thanks to public transport, people save their money and time while they are traveling. Furthermore, who don’t drive, public transportation help them to get to work or school without engaging any friend or family member. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of government should improve public network.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that this benefits to individuals, communities and the local economy are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 55 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-22 | vaimikpatel2908@gmail.com | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... so should be rejected. There are a myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... convenience and economic is concerned. Another pivotal aspect is that thanks to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74336804673 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2413373192 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304888887591 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100195203065 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136785066296 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149445511495 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101286757762 0.0609392437508 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.