In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.)
Recently, written examinations have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?” Whereas it is a widely held view that formal assessments are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, written exams are bound up inextricably with education systems, which indicates they lead to both students and teachers. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between formal education and distant learning as well as an exponential increase in scores. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of good results is correlated positively with not only formal assessments but also training systems.
Within the realm of psychological science, without the slightest doubt, formal examinations attribute to performance appraisal, in that it would come down to stress, anxiety, and depression. A salient example of such attribution is cheating, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take academic achievements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint psychological problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to academic background, systematic training, and even curriculum reform. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education systems.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of written exams are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 85 | view |
| 2018-01-28 | ptaher | 88 | view |
| 2017-12-24 | amin_mostafavi | 80 | view |
| 2017-12-18 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2017-12-18 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- There have been several complaints about the reception area where visitors to your company arrive. Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improvedWrite a letter to your manager. In your letterDescribe the complaints that hav 73
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letterSay where / when you went on holidayExplain why you are not satisfied with your holidayTell them what you would like them to do 87
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88970588235 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29115380058 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672794117647 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6052677106 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115788623169 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396449796605 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543239829392 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631190299195 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547925587248 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.