my template
Recently, the phenomenon of topic and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that N is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N can be a pulse, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, N can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that N, as well as N, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered N. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N and N apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, N might increase the consequence of N. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of N relate to this reality that the demerits of N pertain to N. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N is correlated negatively with N. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that benefits of N far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of N prove the significance of N, but also pinpoint N implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-07 | amin_mostafavi | 11 | view |
- Protecting animals in zoos. agree or disagree? 88
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 85
- Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? 77
- Study a Particular Area of Climate Change: global warming or environmental problems 88
- Tourism in Undeveloped Countries 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06363636364 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38837341215 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3313981086 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6923076923 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0338485325795 0.242375264174 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00897233338031 0.0925447433944 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310810745543 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164066283599 0.151781067708 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284171139003 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.