“Normal” societal roles for women include taking care of the children in the household. But now that women contribute equally in outdoor responsibilities, it would be a little unfair to expect the same amount of dedication towards the upbringing of the children.
Is it okay for men to participate and share the responsibilities of the house and make their presence be felt more in their children's life, or should the mothers be solely responsible?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today' world is the equal contribution of women in the outdoor responsibilities. The impression that should mothers be solely responsible in house responsibilities and upbringing of their children or is it okay for men to participate in sharing responsibilities of the house and make their presence felt more in their children's life is widely debated. I agree with the decision of men taking responsibilities both in house and in their children and I will explain why in the following essay.
There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that encouraging women to participate equally in the outdoor responsibilities will encourage other women's from all around the world to broke the shackles of superstitions and to fulfil their potential. Equal participation of women in work force will help developing the business, the country , and the world itself. For example, Marie Curie, who was a brilliant and renowned women scientist, brock the shackles and became a role models for many ladies all around the world.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that, men taking responsibilities and being a part of their children's life will be a great thing to do for both them and their children. Children's get more time to spend with their father and to know him better. He can guide and lead them in the path of righteousness. This will help in breaking the conventional way of looking at fathers being arrogant and angry all the time. It will be great thing in their life.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, both the participation of women force in labor and of men in household responsibilities will be great factor n bringing greater good in the future. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and should not be rejected.
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 80
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 67
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products 56
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 68
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... in the following essay. There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Childrens
...to do for both them and their children. childrens get more time with their the father and...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90163934426 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10273089308 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485245901639 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8420414185 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256647092806 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872213299321 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545656935578 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159046867264 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449860790804 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.