Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of personal life is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that keeping the work and life balanced can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, excessive working hours can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of working overtime, as well as casual jobs, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between unstable jobs and higher income occupations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both office jobs and working multiple shifts apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, limited time for personal life might increase the consequences of imbalanced work-life hours. Moreover, fundamental aspects of high-quality life could relate to this reality that the demerits of keeping personal goals pertain to achieving life satisfaction. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of paying less attention to personal life is correlated negatively with being a workaholic person. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of damaged personal life.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a balanced lifestyle far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of conventional working hours prove the significance of quality personal life, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss. 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss. 85
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54964539007 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10255317852 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5936890183 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241715611863 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865664845441 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695280418528 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133193574456 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701214209694 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.