Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the internet's role and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of the teacher's role is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having a passive effect on the teacher's role can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, the invention of the internet can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of internet tutorials, as well as online tutors, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between internet universities and low-cost teachers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both massive source of information and online materials apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, traditional teachers might increase the consequences of upskilled teachers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of old materials could relate to this reality that the demerits of online universities pertain to on-site courses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being a knowledgeable teacher is correlated negatively with day to day internet usages. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of internet side effects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the World Wide Web far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online courses prove the significance of online tutors, but also pinpoint educational implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | richierich25 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | maniram vicky | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 61 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. Whether you support them or not? 80
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss. 85
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promotelearning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- Senior executives should get their employees involved in the decision making process. What is your opinion in this? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'internets'' or 'Internet's'?
Suggestion: internets'; Internet's
Recently, the phenomenon of the internets role and its corresponding impact has s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...allenged by many that the matter of the teachers role is highly beneficial, such issue i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...eve that having a passive effect on the teachers role can be a plus and I will analyze t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53429602888 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17891714462 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6371170913 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142165120371 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483819760616 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334934196502 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789403846421 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439499230571 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.