Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation?
Recently, the phenomenon of marketing strategies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of international companies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a well-maintained reputation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, placing discounted offers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the price-based marketing strategy, as well as marketing discount schemes, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between marketing standards and companies policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both marketing revenues and impacting the company's legacy apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, big companies' reputations might increase the consequences of misguided strategies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a damaged reputation could related to this reality that the demerits of unstable strategies pertain to a start up company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of long-lasting negative impacts is correlated negatively with the market's ups and downs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of enhanced financial strategic methods.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the necessity of marketing methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of discounted goods prove the significance of an amazing reputation, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-02-17 | meenutalwar | 85 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | Harsh1279 | 80 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. Whether you support them or not? 80
- Senior executives should get their employees involved in the decision making process. What is your opinion in this? 80
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...l aspects of a damaged reputation could related to this reality that the demerits of un...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80144404332 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31488943484 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657039711191 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3776201269 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270741831745 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839424588883 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619015937105 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137477858875 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691600423654 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.