Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending time at work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex ways is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and so positive by a real number of people. I am inclined to believe that hard-working employees can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general stand point, modern life can offer the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as final outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, having time for personal life might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To end, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working life of people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | minhaz | 85 | view |
- Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 88
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree? 85
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13164848318 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695833333333 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5327642909 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162267977319 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576824486828 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855804006744 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894756412755 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547131286859 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.