The only thing that interferes with my learning is toy education- Einstein? What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct?
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the role of conventional ways of acquiring education across the globe, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. As such, there are both merits and demerits to the given trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter, and I do not entirely accord with Einstein.
At the outset, there are myriad of upsides for effective learning by the traditional education system. The most conspicuous one is that not every learner possess extraordinary talent as prodigies like Albert Einstein and William Shakespear who did not require a proper learning environment. Not only do mediocre students need a step by step procedure in order to attain knowledge successfully, which also varies according to their age, but frequent tests and exams are also essential to ensure that such students have learnt their lessons properly. Needless to say, all these merits will stand learners in a preponderant position, as far as effective learning is concerned.
To embark this, another pivotal facet of the argument is that the curriculum is set in such a way that by the time they finish their academic studies, students learn a variety of subjects. Besides, they gain knowledge in such fields as science, commerce, arts and literature, thus extending their horizons, instilling essential values in them and above all honing their skills in numerous fields. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that demerits without a fixed guideline to follow will have a far-reaching impact on the learners.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that formal education complements learning and benefits of the education are indeed too great to ignore.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 90
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- . Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29225352113 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86094745378 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.255173101 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.3 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110573520903 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425972047195 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312146263109 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669301170124 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03108521696 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.