Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of children's behavior and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that poor upbringing is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individual. I am inclined to believe that parents ‘responsibility can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a societal standpoint, children's behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that aggressive behaviors, as well as alcoholic parents, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered lack of proper schooling. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both burden responsibility and social capacity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational science, divorce increases the consequences of a tidal wave of crime. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of street crime relate to this reality that the demerits of family support pertain to child responsibility. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social networks is correlated negatively with mass media. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of literacy.
To conclude, while there several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of behavior development far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of new generation prove the significance of parent’s trait, but also pinpoint children's character implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-12 | jagadeeshjimmy | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | Daniel Torres | 85 | view |
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why? 11
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76326530612 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45479283065 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69387755102 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7832818703 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133266620829 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402564128647 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465927085146 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749211603171 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481882442362 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.