Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s act. what is your opinion? support with example.
The importance of legally holding parents liable for children's behaviour, which was debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of parents on children has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on society, in recent years. It can be said that, parents are to blame for their children’s act, however, some people believe parents should not be accountable for their children behaviour. This essay will elaborate why parents should lawfully be in charge of for their children act and why parents are not always legally accountable for their children's actions and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why parents should be responsible for their children’s conduct, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, parents influence children right from the start. Example for instance, children often replicate parents behaviour and response to various events as their parents would. Moreover, hostile upbringing of a children can effect there overall development and there is a good chance of children turning towards destructive path. Parents, thus should be legally held accountable for their children’s doings.
Nevertheless, some adopt opposing view and tend to believe that parents have no involvement in path their offsprings choose, as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most prominent one lies in the fact that, environment children are born in, also plays a critical factor. Example as a illustration, according to research done at Juvenile correction centre, the studies claims that, 50% of children’s behaviour is influenced by the surrounding they live in. Furthermore, rookie neighbourhood has been nominated as the main reason for children’s attitude development towards life. Therefore, it can be said that parents not necessarily have impact on their offsprings demeanour.
For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that parents has legal answerability of their offsprings behaviour is prominent, but environment which they are raised should not be overlooked.
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 80
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offers and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation. 77
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 88
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Global climate change. who should take responsibility to avoid climate change from government, corporate and individual discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
... would. Moreover, hostile upbringing of a children can effect there overall development an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lso plays a critical factor. Example as a illustration, according to research don...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1207.87684729 150% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62732919255 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10673891794 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6041815908 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449114724248 0.242375264174 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193050861227 0.0925447433944 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117446802065 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303588182241 0.151781067708 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987639535786 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.