Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is YOUR opinion? Support it with personal examples
Children behavior must manage by their parents, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that parents have responsibility for their children actions, others maintain that teenagers can take care of themselves. I am inclined to believe parents input can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
To begin with, from the beginning children learn from their parents and mimic their behaviors, which will help them to develop their intellectual abilities. There skills are not reliable as their parents, because they have less patient and experience. For instance, when I was studying at high school, I made various discussion reflexively. As a result, my parents always assisted me to prevent future problems. In addition, parents must teach their children about how their actions will affect their life.
From a social standpoint, children do not always require parent’s attention, because they have to understand the adverse output of their acts. Their acts and behavior will judge their future life style, and social communication with others. For example, a scientific research conducted by prestigious university has asserted that those children who learned from themselves have stable mindset than the others. Therefore, it can presume that everyone has their own perspective of learning, but parent’s suggestions are very important.
In a nutshell, there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that self-learning is the most crucial factor for children success.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | jenifer | 55 | view |
2019-12-24 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
2019-12-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
2019-11-17 | priyaavs23 | 80 | view |
2019-09-30 | Jaskaransingh11 | 55 | view |
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If it is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about ‘Nature of democracy?’ 77
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. 77
- In the competition for consumerism, natural resources are fast depleting and run the risk of disappearing from the face of the Earth. What steps do you think governments and people should take to protect and preserve the natural resources? 85
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57851239669 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92043243713 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6851326524 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267384521992 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949302797297 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487887283182 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156338374701 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536901867061 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.