The pen is mightier than the sword. Discuss the extend to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples form own expeirence or observations.
There is a saying that "the pen is mightier than the sword". This phrase means than mentally persuasion is a more powerful way of enacting change compared to physically forcing a change typically through violent means. This essay will discuss why "the sword is a more effective way to make a change in this world".
Firstly, using words to affect change is the usually slow process and is a lot less powerful when compared to physically forcing change.
Oftentimes, one has to mentally manipulate someone to agree to something which can take a very long time. For example, if you want to see the local law change you must write to the local council who may or may not take action and this process will be lengthy. Thus, it would seem that if you want to do something more efficiently, and more powerfully, then you should do it with force.
Furthermore, if want to get something done in this world, then you should do it using physical force, and in some case by violent means. Words will only go so far whereas physical force cannot be ignored. For instance, rather than writing to somebody to make a change you can call them and physically threaten them. Overall, by using your physical presence the person will be much more likely to make the change you wish to see.
In conclusion, this essay discussed how words are powerful yet slow and actions, and potentially violent ones, are far more powerful.
In my opinion, "the pen is not mightier than the sword", meaning that physical force has a more significant effect than speaking or writing words.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | sattar_iust | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | craigh | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | hamza93 | 93 | view |
- The pen is mightier than the sword Discuss the extend to which you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples form own expeirence or observations 91
- Nowadays people pay attention more about fashion, is it good trend or not. 78
- hotel disappointment service 11
- Artifically intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs.some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots. other believe that there is a limit to the tasks that robots can performs 77
- hotel disappointment letter 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83882783883 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59812075422 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2585275395 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160558389531 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631268853042 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399775366501 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802814853664 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454814636832 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.