Technology has made things easy for us, and now we can do our most of the work using a computer and internet without interacting with a person face to face. In the long run, this will have bad effects on the individual and society. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
Internet, computers, and smartphone availability have given us the ability to perform all of our everyday tasks online. For example, Now using a computer, we can shop online, pay bills, do banking. This all is done without facing any person.
Even though technology has made our life easy, but it still has some side effects. We are day by day becoming a nonsocial society. Even though we are connected to hundreds of friends online, but in reality, we do not have real friends to whom we can talk to face to face. Now interaction is happening online. This has bad effects on the individual and society.
After analyzing the above facts, I would like to recapitulate that, even though the technology has made our life easy, but this also isolated us, human interaction is decreasing day by day, which have bad effects on the individual and society.
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which is more important? 77
- Personal Development is the base for professionaldevelopment and advancing in one's career. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 61
- . Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 70
- some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Discuss the advantages of each. Then indicate which you prefer and why. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...t have real friends to whom we can talk to face to face. Now interaction is happening online. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 1207.87684729 82% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57792747361 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 139.433497537 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.4316018311 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122035261985 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484117980134 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481051478858 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821266814262 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414546711041 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.