Personal development. To what extent do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of personal development and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of personal characteristics is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the self-motivation can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, personal disciplines can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of respect to others, as well as the enhanced knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the practical skills and motivational speech. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the positive outlook and the healthy lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, personal attitude might increase the consequences of leading society in the wrong way. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the wrong attitude could relate to this reality that the demerits of dangerous attitude pertain to kill someone’s life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious college has asserted that the downside of the horrible communication is correlated negatively with the performance ratings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the professional career.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development in professional growth far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of problem-solving capabilities prove the significance of satisfactory personal life, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-22 | mndpsngh21 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Ekta shah | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 77 | view |
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree?
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78518518519 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41773796313 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8773543211 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927615821919 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307494871182 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348380418951 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555632936893 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339854164487 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.