Pros and cons of technology
A lot of technological advancements have been taking place day by day, and which clearly reflect people’s lifestyles both positively and negatively and we should assert the need of observing the precarious outcome of it for the rise of a risk-free society in the future.
Technology reduces the effort of people which provides countless visible techniques to simplify the work. It is conspicuous that from paper clips to ultra-modern spacecraft's work on the principles of science and technology. It made our life way too easier and gave us so many fruitful outcomes in the field of medicine, science, communication, transport, genetics and engineering; as a result, we increased life expectancy, made space travel possible and done so many complex permutations in a millisecond.
However, at the same pace technology brings some threats to people; For instance, the inventions of weapons especially nuclear war gadgets are extremely dangerous for the existence of the entire life forms on earth. In addition to that, an increased use of motor vehicles causes the contamination of our ecosystem which resulted in certain problems such as global warming and unsteady climates.
The appropriate use of technology by taking the positive effects can bring about great changes in our lifestyles. By promoting global peace by anti-war campaigns can counter the use of weapons. Also, making awareness in individuals about the hazardous outcome of increased fuel emission from automobiles can be instrumental in avoiding threats associated with global warming.
In a conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of science and technology purely depend upon the way in which we implement them. Let’s hope for the world without enduring the dangerous outcome of these inventions in near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-02 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | Basil3241 | 81 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | navneet sidhu | 72 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | mndpsngh21 | 75 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 80
- Student travel to study is overrated we have brilliant scholars who studied locally Is travel really required for higher studies 73
- Holdays tour tourism 85
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4964028777 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12362800481 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1133246614 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.909090909 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883301701032 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361548885528 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412430208636 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497456108422 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00876240328512 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.