schools should prepare students for universities rather than work. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons / or examples from your experience or observations.
The knowledge imparted in schools should be purely on the basis to prepare students for next higher education level. Some people think that schools play a pivotal role to assist pupils in order to get admitted in universities, while others maintain that training bombarded in schools should be aimed to help students to make way into job sectors. This essay will discuss that why schools are to play an instrumental role in boosting the children to get into universities rather than aiming to have better jobs.
Firstly, schools are considered as basic building block in learning arena. However, the primary education skills transferred in these citadels of learning should equip the students with academic knowledge instead of preparing them for practical job sector. For instance, schools are to make endeavors to polish students in various academic subjects as this would help them to get better scores and end up in better universities. Therefore, the aim of schools should be confined towards academic rather than practical knowledge.
On the other hand, students undergoing studies at schools are in a very young phase of their life; thereby, owing to the maturity level of pupils it is quite difficult for the schools to impart job related knowledge to the students. As an example, a student aged 13 will be unable to understand the practicality of life which can be better understood and implemented by mature and undergrad students. Hence, schools should restrict themselves to theoretical portion of studies instead of preparing students for job sectors.
To conclude, schools should serve their purpose as basic building block for assisting students to enter into universities instead of providing them with job related knowledge.
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 70
- It should be the environment rather than economic development for the government to focus on. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Should men and women divide household work equally. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 77
- interesting friend
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years In your opinion what are the positive and negative impacts of this change 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31294964029 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72799693722 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9743388707 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.272727273 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214957452872 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966041844875 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427554012833 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147027184153 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235186973521 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.