Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that Governments should promote the building of new roads to allow more vehicles. Critics, however, claim that instead of promoting construction of new roads, government should build more networks of public transportation. I, personally believe that later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important aspects of this statement before deducing final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument discussing the fact that promoting public transport is Eco-friendly and suitable option for citizens to travel. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that public transport is the best suitable option for every citizen to avoid traffic issues, reduces noise pollution and overcomes depletion of ozone layer. As a prime example, according to recent research from the department of medical science, combustion of fuel from car engine is one of the major cause of global warming.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this statement is that car owners have the freedom to enjoy private time and the most feasible option to avoid congestion in public transportation. In addition, they are not bound to follow strick schedules of trains and buses. But this statement does not hold fully water.
To recapitualate, forgoing discussion propounds that there is a dire need of government efforts to promote public transport. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 93
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 80
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 77
- Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important aspects of this statement bef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overcomes depletion of ozone layer. As a prime example, according to recent resea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83649683337 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4359153068 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271945724368 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849124276424 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104719085235 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135174294416 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11914899219 0.0609392437508 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.