should government spend money to build roads
In the contemporary era, the issue of traffic congestion is mushrooming rapidly around the work. Therefore, most of the experts believe that the authorities should build roads to curb this problem. However, others decline this notion because they think that the management should invest money to improve public transportation. In this essay, I elaborate both sides before giving a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, construction of roads to facilitate numerous vehicles has myriad benefits to mankind as they can save their time because more roads means less traffic jams. Secondly, it is fruitful to the economy of any country as it will aid to industrial area in import and export goods, to cite an epitome, a study conducted by The Economic Times reveals that 70% revenue is inclined of industries due to build roads with latest technologies.
On the flip side, the government should make budget to improve the condition of public transport so that people switch to it from private transport. This trend not only plummet the utilization of private cars but also beneficial for ambience, for instance, China has made numerous trains with a plethora of facilities using latest technology, which would further fruitful for the atmosphere, and decline in owning more than one vehicle.
To recapitulate, after analyzing all points, I firmly concur with the statement that government should invest money wisely on both builds roads as well as improving public transportation to boosting the economy, environment, and to curtail traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 55 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-22 | vaimikpatel2908@gmail.com | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...s they can save their time because more roads means less traffic jams. Secondly, it i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...clined of industries due to build roads with latest technologies. On the flip side, the go...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the latest'.
Suggestion: using the latest
...us trains with a plethora of facilities using latest technology, which would further fruitfu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...nvest money wisely on both builds roads as well as improving public transportation to boos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35918367347 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86653267544 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644897959184 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2226219014 50.4703680194 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.888888889 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26361341345 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100792545665 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929875800144 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157278256076 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791640390016 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.