Should governments build ore roads to allow more vehicles, or should they improve the network of public transports? Give your opinion.
The effect of building more roads to solve traffic congestion has always been a debatable issue. Some people say that it will be beneficial for the society as a whole if governments build more roads whereas some are in the support of improving the public transportation. However, I am inclined towards the fact that building a strong network of public provisions will be fruitful.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why building roads is not a wise step but most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it will result in deforestation. Consequently, more roads will mean more traffic which will eventually lead to accumulation of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere emitted through vehicles. As an illustration, people more likely will use their cars and bikes due to extra catering of roads eventually resulting in extreme congestion. Hence, building roads is feasible but not effective, and investment will go in vain.
However, approach of improving public transportation will for surely decline the problem of traffic congestion and other environmental problems. Government, firstly, should make the prices of public facilities affordable for people so that diverse masses are in the favor of using them. Undoubtedly, it will not only decrease the air pollution but will also make the roads less congested and convenient for pedestrians as well. Therefore, the enhancement of public transport with regards to quality with cheaper rates will be a commendable initiative.
Succinctly, it can be said that efficiency of creating a better transport network is prominent, although slight benefits of having more roads should not be overlooked.
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 55
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants, what are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 77
- What do you think is the most important invention for the past 100 years ' antibiotics,airplane or computers? And why? 55
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of cashless society? Discuss. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35249042146 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02114993451 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.902085834 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259044047257 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981516765489 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444623840388 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164020058986 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391783646451 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.