In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opinion.
In many countries there is a huge income disparity among people. This is because some people are earning astronomical salaries. At the same time, there are many people who are struggling to make both ends meet. Some people, therefore, argue that the government should cap salaries. I do not agree with this view. In my opinion, this difference in salary is good for economy because it encourages people work harder.
If there is a limit to what people can earn, most of them will lose the motivation to work harder. The reason that encourages people work harder and harder is the yearning to earn higher salaries. Therefore, if the government caps the salaries, it will hurt the morale of employees. Also , having a small number of people who earn too much is not necessarily a bad thing. They act as an inspiration for the poor. These super wealthy people can also start enterprises that create jobs and improve the living standards of the poor people.
Of course, income disparity is not a good thing. It makes the poor feel inadequate. But at the same time, it encourages many of them to work harder and earn more. As human beings, we have a natural tendency to want more. We get inspired by the affluent lifestyle of the rich people and want to be like them. This human desire to improve their living standards is the factor that drives all economies. The government can certainly do something to lessen the disparity. For example, it can impose higher taxes for rich people. It can also launch welfare schemes for the poor. By offering free education and health care facilities for the people living below the poverty line, the government can put them in a position to work and earn.
To conclude, capping salaries is the solution for income disparity. Instead, the government should empower the poor people and help them earn a good salaries by offering them free education and training.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | davidlvg1108 | 69 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | vinay.zigma | 55 | view |
- Everyone Should Adopt Vegetarianism 77
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 56
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 55
- Everyone Should Adopt Vegetarianism 77
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... will hurt the morale of employees. Also , having a small number of people who ear...
^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... the morale of employees. Also , having a small number of people who earn too much is not necessa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 328.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78658536585 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50595690929 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490853658537 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.6157635468 282% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 12.6551724138 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8125774734 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.4166666667 104.977214359 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.9669160288 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 6.9802955665 215% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341547386084 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970760563457 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832564536246 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233244990551 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531273713482 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 12.6369458128 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.1260098522 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.9458128079 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.