Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The emergence of multinational companies in developing countries is becoming a popular topic among demographics, and its controversial aspects have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that international companies will help developing countries to grow quickly, others maintain that governments should support local companies to succeed rather than taking help from developed countries. I agree that multinational companies can be a plus point for developing countries. I will discuss both views in detail with an example.
Firstly, economy can rapidly grow by allowing multinational companies to enter in developing countries. This will not just help those countries to gain prosperity, but also creates more jobs and opportunities for locals. As an example, China was once a poor country, but decade later, this country has developed and have become one of the most powerful country in the world, because its government completely opened doors for foreign companies. From this solid example, it is clear that multinational companies are a great asset for under developed countries.
From a social standpoint, those people who maintain that foreign companies are destruction for their local businesses have completely underestimated the benefits of making deals with developed countries. For instance, USA helped Congo economy to grow, and not just financially, but also helped their local companies to gain wealth and recognition throughout the world. It is clear that there are no negative impacts of introducing foreign companies to developing countries.
To conclude, developing countries can grow on their own, but it will take tremendous amount of time and effort, or they can seek aid from developed countries, which is more efficient in the current era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | cur_zii | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | hchandra | 79 | view |
| 2018-03-07 | anuvijay | 72 | view |
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others 77
- A successful man is not the one who has ability to eliminate problems before they occur, but the one who can face the difficulties as they arise and solve them. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is YOUR opinion? Support it with personal examples 80
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 75
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
... that international companies will help developing countries to grow quickly, others maint...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56826568266 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02714848434 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.286963164 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337517139302 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138343659786 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859698192355 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21448712196 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104795460494 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.