Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The emergence of multinational companies in developing countries is becoming a popular topic among demographics, and its controversial aspects have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that international companies will help developing countries to grow quickly, others maintain that governments should support local companies to succeed rather than taking help from developed countries. I agree that multinational companies can be a plus point for developing countries. I will discuss both views in detail with an example.
Firstly, economy can rapidly grow by allowing multinational companies to enter in developing countries. This will not just help those countries to gain prosperity, but also creates more jobs and opportunities for locals. As an example, China was once a poor country, but decade later, this country has developed and have become one of the most powerful country in the world, because its government completely opened doors for foreign companies. From this solid example, it is clear that multinational companies are a great asset for under developed countries.
From a social standpoint, those people who maintain that foreign companies are destruction for their local businesses have completely underestimated the benefits of making deals with developed countries. For instance, USA helped Congo economy to grow, and not just financially, but also helped their local companies to gain wealth and recognition throughout the world. It is clear that there are no negative impacts of introducing foreign companies to developing countries.
To conclude, developing countries can grow on their own, but it will take tremendous amount of time and effort, or they can seek aid from developed countries, which is more efficient in the current era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | cur_zii | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | hchandra | 79 | view |
| 2018-03-07 | anuvijay | 72 | view |
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. 77
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? Argumentative / persuasive/ opinionated type essay. 80
- In the competition for consumerism, natural resources are fast depleting and run the risk of disappearing from the face of the Earth. What steps do you think governments and people should take to protect and preserve the natural resources? 85
- Some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and they take little interest in the country they are visiting. Others prefer to travel around the country and to see how the people live, to get to know their cu 77
- With the advent of Internet age increasing number of workers are doing their jobs from home and communicating with their office through Internet Known as telecommuting this trend is expected to catch up with most office workers in the coming decades How i 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
... that international companies will help developing countries to grow quickly, others maint...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56826568266 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02714848434 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.286963164 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337517139302 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138343659786 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859698192355 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21448712196 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104795460494 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.