Over the past few decades there have been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether low changes the human behavior or not. Whereas some people thinks that law changes the human behaviour I sanguinely believe that it is opposite law and low does not changes the human behaviour, this essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, conspicuously, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reasons is that it's the people who changes themself and not the law, there are multiple examples to support, one of example is of the traffic lite, where it has been observed that as soon as the traffic inspectors leaves the traffic lite people tend to break the law, so it can be clearly says that unless people determined to change themself law have very less role to play in changing human behavior.
On the contrary, there are some skeptics who conjecture that, law play a significant role in changing the human behaviour, as per them law shows its results in long run initially people may reluctant to follow the roel but as the time passes it changes their behaviour. Although its seems ostensibly veridical this only applies to a certain group of society and is not true for every one.
After analysing the above facts i would like to recapitulate that law does not change the human behavior, government can certainly have the people follow the law using the law enforcement agency but it certainly does not guarantee change of the human behavior.
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 85
- Government should reduce their investment inarts, music and painting. Agree or Disagree. 80
- In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: change
...hat it is opposite law and low does not changes the human behaviour, this essay will fu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...hat it is opposite law and low does not changes the human behaviour, this essay will fu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a logical conclusion. At the outset, conspicuously, there are myriads of reas...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... of the most compelling reasons is that its the people who changes themself and not...
^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...one. After analysing the above facts i would like to recapitulate that law doe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83271375465 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4923093105 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531598513011 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.5024630542 215% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.173815425 50.4703680194 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 216.666666667 104.977214359 206% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.8333333333 20.9669160288 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368676909537 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186677757324 0.0925447433944 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102167022565 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241681681854 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505937241255 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 12.6369458128 188% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.9458128079 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.3980295567 188% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.