Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them?
The importance of adopt a pet to fill someone presence which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The significant influence of pets might help people to do not feel lonely has spaked the controversy over this trend on people that can not look after themselves in recent years. it can be agreed that to take care of something first the person should be able to take proper care about themselves. Nonetheless, this essay will elaborate how different opinions might impact and how a law for this specific case may solve parts of this problem and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why a single busy person adopt a pet to supply a partner left, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that usually those people has not time enough and several hours of the day the pet stay lonely. As an illustration, a University of Adelaide study has shown that in Australia just people with good financial condictions can have a pet. Therefore, any law has been created for this case in specific.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks which might overwhelm my though about the substantial influence pet for lonely people nowadays, but the most alarming one is rooted from the fact that a pet needs someone to feel not mad or careless. For instance, a pet owner should have at the least one hour for each period of the day to hang out with their pet. Hence, both pet and owner would not feel alone having each other.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that many cases exist and many are distinguished although a vigilation regarging the pets should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | shyamsingh08 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Kushi | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Agustinaac | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- Many people like nurse and teachers should get more pay, especially in recent years, people in finance, film actors and company leaders are getting more pay. What's your opinion? 77
- Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles, skates, the subway, etc.? 88
- Technological inventions come out on a daily basis. Take one example and discuss its advantage and disadvantage to individual and society. 77
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 85
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... look after themselves in recent years. it can be agreed that to take care of some...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76816608997 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58689805027 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581314878893 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7029838533 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.272727273 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283870606778 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104143725835 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614262911819 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154741347191 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551175724501 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.