Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished, while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives. What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison, punishment or rehabilitation?
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished, while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that punishing criminals might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the rehabilitation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the primary function of prisons as teaching criminals how to lead better lives can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that teaching criminals and the punishment are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of prisons. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both returning to normal life and the rehabilitation distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, prisons as the place where criminals should be punished might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of increasing crime rates. Moreover, fundamental aspects of criminals' aims can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of self-esteem can pertain to spending time in prisons. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of prisons were correlated positively with teaching a skill, the local authorities would ultimately address motivations. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of eliminating prisons.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of prisons as teaching criminals how to lead better lives far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-08 | sattar_iust | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | sattar_iust | 90 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | sattar_iust | 80 | view |
- There are more negative impacts than benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Being a journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world To what extent you agree with it 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17048191219 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6971890645 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.363636364 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438840229931 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129067324119 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146738193486 0.071462118173 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240010013892 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126735829796 0.0609392437508 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.