some people think that accessing performance through written examination is not good and there are others mode of evaluation available. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

some people think that accessing performance through written examination is not good and there are others mode of evaluation available. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the tech savvy era, it is an irrefutable fact that education has changed significantly. some people think that assessing performance through written examination is still valid whereas another mode of assessment is available. I will discuss my viewpoints in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, written examination happens to be the most fundamental and essential part of education starting from kinder garden to high level degrees. With written examination, teacher will come to know about the grammatical mistakes, spelling mistakes and perception of student so that it can be reduced with effective measures. Adding, re-evaluation of exam facility is available in written examination.

On the other hand, as the technology is progressing leaps and bounds, there have been many changes seen every field. some teachers use another mode of assessment of children like oral presentation through power point. it proves to be the best way to built up the confidence to speak in front of others. it is suitable for those children who are not able to perform well in written examination. For instance, one of my friend who did not who did not perform well in writing but he had excellent oral fluency so he got selected in multinational company. These mode create practical ideas. it is well said by Albert Einstein, “Imagination is more important than education”.

To conclude, it can be said that assessment through written examination can be taken as highly rewarded but another modes of assessment should not be marginalized.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-13 jasman singh 72 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...at education has changed significantly. some people think that assessing performance...
^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ave been many changes seen every field. some teachers use another mode of assessment...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... oral presentation through power point. it proves to be the best way to built up t...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...confidence to speak in front of others. it is suitable for those children who are ...
^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this mode' or 'These modes'?
Suggestion: This mode; These modes
... got selected in multinational company. These mode create practical ideas. it is well said...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...any. These mode create practical ideas. it is well said by Albert Einstein, '...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30081300813 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14447119893 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626016260163 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3017764109 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1428571429 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200520443604 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643774279475 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840735008581 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124833858679 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596574010307 0.0609392437508 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.