Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of giving more practical training instead of theoretical knowledge and its corresponding impact has a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reinforcing the practical ability is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the study of using both practical and theoretical educational methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, developing the practical ability can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of promoting the cognitive skills, as well as the teamwork ability, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of using the practical training on developing the capacity of student’s brain. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the oral presentation and working in the lab can be seen.
Within the realm of science, providing more practical lessons through the courses might increase the consequences of doing the practical tasks. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of more manual lessons could relate to this reality that the demerits of theoretical knowledge pertain to lack of applicable materials. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the practical courses is correlated negatively with lack of educational devices. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the discussion course.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of giving more practical training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of more challenging lessons prove the significance of stimulating the student’s practical ability, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | maryam2 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 80
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
- It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas. 80
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71287128713 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25045482135 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2057026884 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.25 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250308720192 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849955418837 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537516703251 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145332911071 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348144194034 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.