Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of practical training and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that practical experience might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical skills of graduates can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, practical courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that useful experience, as well as effective learning, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a vital role in student's success. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both obtaining profound knowledge and improving practical knowledge apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the acquisition of theoretical knowledge might increase the consequences of limited knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of factual knowledge relate to this reality that the demerits of functionally illiterate pertain to missing future career. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of empirical knowledge is correlated negatively with experienced knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of well-rounded education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of growing critical thinkers, but also pinpoint academic qualifications implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | maryam2 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 88
- Essay topics: Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 88
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93359375 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33759061426 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66015625 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2785542347 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172742609377 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538245286313 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281415130682 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891787115628 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195523051639 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.4 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.