Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of teaching music in school and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of art education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded to be thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that agreeing to study music at early education levels can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, musical knowledge can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of artistic characteristic, as well as soul nourishing activities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered positive effects of music on study subjects. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learning to play an instrument and musical entanglement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of career success, deeming music as important as other subjects of study might increase the consequences of future unemployment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educational syllabus relate to this reality that the demerits of art centered education pertain to higher rates of job dissatisfaction. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of focusing too much on learning music is correlated negatively with antisocial behaviors. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of abstaining from early music education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the advantages of deeming music studies as important as other educational subjects far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of being able to play an instrument prove the significance of personal satisfaction, but also pinpoint soul enriching practices implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-15 | Sinabri | 85 | view |
2020-01-03 | khaledayasmin | 80 | view |
2020-01-03 | khaledayasmin | 80 | view |
2020-01-03 | khaledayasmin | 85 | view |
2019-10-29 | ha.sarafraz1981@gmail.com | 88 | view |
- In some societies, it is increasingly common to try to achieve good health and fitness through physically demanding sports, special diets, or preventative medicine conventional or alternative. Some people, however, believe that the best way to stay fit an 89
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree? Advantages or disadvantages? 77
- Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 80
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree? 88
- Many people choose to learn practical subjects therefore theoretical subjects will no longer be taught in universities Do you agree or disagree 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6632996633 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30070072333 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.844896322 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.166666667 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159887473758 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546190830255 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452656528583 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922049107114 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204117233622 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.