Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of children learning promotion and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern methods of educations like musical learning is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that musical training can be plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, new promoted methods of learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of increased quality of children life, as well as practical education method, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered marvelous results of musical based practice method to the developed learning strategies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both entertainment to leaning and mass media role in education apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, mounting unfavorable effects of traditional education method of children might increase the consequence of weak learning in child’s life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of undesirable results of mentioned methods would relate to this reality that the demerits of difficult learning subjects pertain to getting bored during studying. As an example some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of child life is correlated negatively with low-quality education. Hence ,it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of bad methods of learning.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using music-based method of upbringing far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of talent growth prove the significance of better learning, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
- The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 80
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and giv 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rtain to getting bored during studying. As an example some scientific research und...
^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tively with low-quality education. Hence ,it is correct to presume the preconceive...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71140939597 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15365549697 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651006711409 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6534855532 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.727272727 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168079063174 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593326808622 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409484960715 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949830978719 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305075856217 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.