Some universities/schools believe that students/children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting. How far do you agree with that? Show reasons with your experience.
Recently, students' typing and handwriting have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Should universities prefer teaching typing rather than good handwriting?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that learning to type with computers is highly beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, modern learning strategies are bound up inextricably with cognitive skills, which indicates they lead to both assignments and courses. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between cyber educations and academic knowledge as well as an exponential increase in corresponding courses. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of tutors is correlated positively with not only intellectual training but also computer-based skills.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt keyboards attribute to good handwriting, in that it would come down to virtual classes, multimedia materials, and the internet. A salient example of such attribution is online learning, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take E-books for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint modern technologies problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to written assignments, formal exams, and even creative students. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of learning to type in education developments.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that having good handwriting beside the ability to type by computer is absolutely important. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-08 | baran.bahrani | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. 11
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 88
- What do you think are the strengths and weakness of the education system in your country. Use your own experience to support your idea. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng rather than good handwriting?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that learning...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84931506849 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31426883823 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688356164384 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0988449074 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178060463591 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487007290712 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528437236553 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100755306403 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614557631678 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.