Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model of youngsters. Do you support it or not?
A little retrospection would reveal and history has witnessed sports person and famous movies actors play a crucial in our society. However, they consider as a role model for new generation children. I endorse this view and I will discuss merits and demerits of this phenomenon in following paragraphs.
To begin with, numerous advantages are associated to following popular personalities. The most prominent is sports stars motivates their nation youngster to do some sports to represent their country in front of world. For instance, Kofi Kingston a Jamacian wrestler won WWE championship which encourage their small nation youngsters about the value of sports in their life. Not only this, some celebrities involve in welfare for needy an poor people, consequently, younger ones also do some work for helping the society.
Nevertheless, to following the famous celebrities also put some bad impacts on society. The first and foremost is, to earn extra money they do some adults adds as well as dangerous stunts due to this children try to imitate that things in their life which results some time they become a victim of illegal activities. To epitomize, Sanjay Dutt, a bollywood stars who involve in criminal offences which led his fans to do strike for his escape from prison.
To conclude, I firmly believe, undoubtedly, famous individuals are part and parcel for common people in the society. Needless to say, they do some false things which are unavoidable.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
2019-06-07 | Dilpreet singh | 72 | view |
2019-06-07 | Majheal Singh | 77 | view |
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white-water river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 72
- Crime is increasing at an alarming rate What are the causes and solutions of this 46
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of mass media? 55
- In order to reverse the decline in the quality of life in cities arising due to air pollution and congestion on roads various efforts should be made to encourage people to use less private cars and more public transport what are the ways that can be used 89
- Nowadays, it is common knowledge that plastic pollutes the environment. Thus, do you think companies should be allowed to use plastic containers for their products? Please state what is your opinion is and why? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...elebrities involve in welfare for needy an poor people, consequently, younger ones...
^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...iety. Nevertheless, to following the famous celebrities also put some bad impacts on society. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...adds as well as dangerous stunts due to this children try to imitate that things in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79394072859 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638655462185 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5803058222 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12575909549 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454738526183 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535050865649 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706069671747 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281358857425 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.